Description
1) Developing watershed resilience with nature-based
solutions
Garrett Altmann, M.Sc., Department of Forestry
at Santa Clara Pueblo, galtmann@santaclarapueblo.org
Co-presenters: Chelsea Morganti, cmorganti@wittobriens.com
Abstract: Santa Clara
Pueblo is a federally recognized Native American tribe located along the Rio
Grande River in northern New Mexico, USA. Over the past 25-years, severe
wildfires have cumulatively burned over 80% of Santa Clara forested lands.
Compounding these disasters, post-fire flooding devastated the Santa Clara
Creek and Canyon, an area historically relied upon for recreation, economic
revenue, and spiritual sanctuary. The result is five Federal Presidential
Disaster Declarations to date, over $200M in infrastructure damages, and 100%
fish kill in this 31,481-acre watershed.
Santa Clara Pueblo has embarked on a collaborative recovery strategy,
prioritizing natural stream function in its flood mitigation and restoration
approach. Utilizing indigenous traditional ecological knowledge (ITEK) and
combining this with expertise from federal and state agencies, non-governmental
organizations, and specialized consultants, the Tribe is able to implement ‘a
naturalistic approach to flood mitigation and watershed restoration.’ This
approach recognizes naturally occurring processes that mitigate disturbances,
and then facilitates these nature-based processes to mitigate hazards and
maximize ecosystem services. We will
describe the specific techniques utilized by the pueblo, already showing
progress to restore and maximize ecosystem services, increase biodiversity and
freshwater habitat, increase resilience to future disasters, and support tribal
and recreational use of area. We will also discuss the implementation of
several successful collaborative efforts, including the 2022 Tribal Resiliency
Summit hosted by Santa Clara Pueblo, and the grant funding opportunities
leveraged to make these events possible. Discussion will not only cover the
FEMA Hazard Mitigation Assistance family of grants (BRIC, FMA, PDM, HMGP, and
HMGP-PF) but also a variety of other programs that can be utilized to
accomplish these and similar goals.
2) Case Studies for Creating High Functioning, Lower
Maintenance Stream Corridors
Drew Beck, PE, CFM, PMP, Matrix Design Group, drew.beck@matrixdesigngroup.com
Co-presenters: None
Abstract: Incorporating
the natural and beneficial functions of floodplains in project planning,
design, and construction doesn’t have to be a battle. Presented here are two
case studies of floodplains which were preserved, re-designed, and adaptively
managed in collaboration with the developer, local municipality, and the Mile
High Flood District. The primary goal of each project was to create high
functioning systems that created resilient infrastructure, thriving ecosystems,
and recreational corridors. In addition, a long-term vision of a lower
maintenance, and primarily self-maintaining system was established to benefit
residents and the maintenance entity for years to come. The Preble Creek floodplain was designed to
be contained within a Stream Management Corridor (SMC) including a bankfull
channel, flood terrace and flood bench. The flood bench was designed to manage
100-year flows while also incorporating regional/water-quality detention,
open-space, and recreation amenities as a linear park through the community. In
addition, the SMC is also a designated pollinator corridor which aims to enhance
the overall ecological benefit. The
existing stream corridors throughout the Sterling Ranch development varied
greatly in their condition. This required a thoughtful approach in determining
the design approach for the overall system. Some corridors were completely
rehabilitated, while others preserved, instead relying on an adaptive
management plan to provide stability, while others used a combination of these
two approaches. This presentation will
demonstrate to attendees how they can incorporate the natural and beneficial
functions of floodplains into development projects and how creating
collaborative teams with shared goals and visions from the onset of the project
is vital for project success. Development projects from inception through
construction don’t have to be a constant battle between agencies and
developers. Providing streams with the space that they need, beyond flood
conveyance, leads to better overall outcomes and thriving ecological
infrastructures.
3) Stream Restoration: Nature-Based Solution for Flood Risk Mitigation and Watershed Resiliency
Josh Allen, PE, CFM, SWCA, SWCA, Environmental Consultants, joshua.allen@swca.com
Co-presenters: None
Abstract: Nature-based solutions (NBSs) are increasingly a requirement and/or focus of federal natural disaster recovery and mitigation funding programs. Further, they provide valuable tools toward resiliency of the affected communities and watersheds in the face of more frequent and intense weather-related disasters caused by climate change. However, federal guidance on NBS for flood risk mitigation and watershed resiliency in fluvial settings from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the two primary federal funding agencies for flood disaster mitigation and recovery, has focused only on prescriptions external to the stream channels themselves, such as land conservation, wetland restoration, onsite stormwater management, regional stormwater parks, and floodplain reconnection/restoration. In 2021, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Engineer Research and Development Center published “International Guidelines on Natural and Nature-Based Features for Flood Risk Management”, which for the first time presents river/stream restoration as an appropriate NBS measure for fluvial flood risk management. However, even in this guidance, stream restoration is presented as one of many NBS prescriptions that should be considered in fluvial flood risk management, based on a holistic, watershed approach, and may not be emphasized or prioritized to the extent warranted for the alluvial systems that provide the primary drainage and flood control infrastructure for the majority of the U.S. cities. This presentation will present and discuss stream restoration’s place within the current federal NBS guidance documents and make a case that stream restoration should be the highest priority in the use of NBS in flood risk mitigation and watershed resiliency efforts for a majority of U.S. cities. Examples of successful applications in various urban and suburban watershed settings will then be presented to support the position.
Contributors
-
Garrett Altmann
Garrett Altmann serves as the GIS Coordinator and Project Manager for the Department of Forestry at Santa Clara Pueblo. He attained a Bachelor's in Geography from UC Santa Barbara, and Master of Science in Natural Resources Management from the University of Alaska Fairbanks. He is responsible for coordinating collaborative watershed restoration with federal, state, tribal, and non-governmental organizations. His primary interest is to increase the adoption of nature-based solutions to maximize ecosystem services and increase resilience to climate variability.
-
Drew Beck
Drew is the director of water resources and a senior project manager for the Matrix Design Group water resources group and has over 20 years of engineering experience. He has a bachelor’s degree in civil engineering from Santa Clara University and a master’s degree in hydrology from the Colorado School of Mines. Drew is a licensed civil engineer in three states, a Certified Floodplain Manger, and a Project Management Professional. Drew currently serves as the Board Chair for the Colorado Association of Stormwater and Floodplain Managers. He embraces collaborative and sustainable solutions for his projects and considers himself an ambassador for resilient watersheds.
-
Josh Allen
Josh Allen works for SWCA Environmental Consultants as a Principal Restoration Engineer. Based in SWCA's Charlotte, North Carolina office, he focuses on engineering and design support for ecosystem restoration projects across the country. HIs experience as a consulting civil/environmental engineer spans more than 15 years. Of note, he has served as project manager/lead design engineer for numerous fluvial geomorphological assessment and stream restoration, wetland restoration, stormwater quality, and flood control design projects spanning across North Carolina, South Carolina, Texas, Kansas, Vermont, Massachusetts, Washington, Idaho, and Oregon. These projects have been implemented in numerous physiographic settings across the country, including the mountain, piedmont, prairie, coastal and central plains, and estuarine provinces.